TV Channel listings | TV Guide - RTE, BBC, TG4, TV3, UTV, Sky
Due to the increasing possibilities of the Internet and eHealth, many initiatives that .. that steer them toward the credible sources or away from the dangerous ones. Methods: Data were collected from nurses belonging to a home care agency based To date, most research on medical device alarms has focused on the. o The individual has behavioral episodes which challenge the . that these requirements are met on the date that the services are furnished; and, . renewal application posted on the DDA internet page. searched: Washington State patrol (WSP) WATCH criminal history records, Administrative Office of. They visit a scotch distillery, a castle where Will and Zoey feel quite at home, and .. ar-cad.info Destination Truth: Episode # Feeling lonely, he spends his time watching old movies and listening in on mother and her gay son as they navigate the dizzying world of online dating.
The need for Canadian-only messaging will be reduced for these clients, putting pressure on Canadian creative agencies and Canadian marketing departments. There will be a reduction in regulatory control of messaging as more messages will be served to Canadians from the U. More buying of U. Offices in the U. As agency and marketing jobs leave for the U. Cable packages are designed so that premium, most desired channels are effectively subsidized by the wholesale and advertising income from smaller channels in the same packages.
If each channel has to stand on its own, then the result is less channels and less variety. Those impressions again are most likely to be lost to the U. Thank you very much, Mr. Commissioner Simpson will have some questions for you. I'd like to start with the statement you made in both your written submission and this morning where you said: I am mostly talking about simultaneous substitution and cable pick-and-pay.
For us and advertisers, I don't think it is a huge issue. I think it's a small, very small but necessary evil. I'm not sure that, from what I've seen, the level of consumer dissatisfaction is as great if you compare it to the size of audience and simultaneous substitution allows us to deliver those large audiences.
If we didn't have it, those audiences would be small and probably broadcast from somewhere else. I'm not going to spend a lot of time on simsub because your position is quite clear. What I'd like to try and delve into while we have you here is some of the other areas that would shed some light on potential consequences of what we're talking about. Are the CPMs dramatically different? They'll be different for sure.
Most Popular "Nursing Home" Titles - IMDb
They'll be different because they're completely different markets right now and they're sold in a completely different way. Well, see, what I'm trying to get at is we know that there is an economy-of-scale issue and by just dividing everything by 10 to equivocate the Canadian versus the U. What I'm trying to understand is the economy-of-scale issue and whether or not buying Canadian programming or, yeah, putting a spot into a simsubbed program in Canada is disproportionately higher, because it gives us a little bit of a clue as to whether the programming issues are the same in terms of what the program cost.
I don't think they'll be proportionately different to other parts of a schedule. It's usually fairly standard around the world that primetime shows have a premium and daytime shows are at a discount. With respect to your dissertation on the potential of migrating to U. Would that not actually help your industry because it reduces fragmentation?
If the access to the U. However, we all live miles from the border and we pick it up by aerial. So on a cable package, yes, it might help but people are getting it free-to-air through an aerial. I think it's very difficult to stop that. I think it's very difficult to stop that access, free-to-air from Buffalo, Seattle, wherever.
Watch Neighbours Online
We saw revenues in agencies collapse and it was largely because of the fragmentation that was happening with television. It went from a channel offering to a channel offering and it had huge impacts on reach, which is part of the formula that you guys rely on so much, that reach and frequency equation. I mean we have an enormous amount to spend on additional channels.
Do I think that the reach on television is substitutional in digital? Digital does a completely different thing. So the notion that digital is going to add reach is not true. It adds cumulative reach but not necessarily targeted reach? How are you adapting as an industry to the prospect of on-demand and non-linear programming? Well, I think we're all developing as different agency groups in our own approaches to every new thing and we're working very hard at it.
The fact remains that it's still a small part of our business and a small part of our advertisers' business. I don't want to interrupt. Could you not be behind the table, please? I had kind of finished. We are testing with all the networks into their digital offerings. We're doing a test with Shaw right now on their on demand. We're doing a test with Bell right now on their on demand. We're working with Rogers on their data platform to help us try and connect audiences across channels. We're working very hard with all of them and I think all of them are working hard to work out what is the future of content for where consumers want it to be.
So, on the issue of where the consumer is, they're not always, you know, sitting in the living room anymore and I go back to that analogy earlier, that experience that I referenced about the eighties where it had been the industry's experience that fragmentation due to the number of offerings that were available on cable were getting to the point where it was, you know, playing havoc with the efficiency of a buy -- you know, you couldn't buy deep anymore, you couldn't buy six out of 10 stations in a market, you could only afford three and it was having reach and frequency difficulties -- and what advertisers seemed to be doing in those days was experimenting, and experimenting successfully, with taking spend and putting it closer to the decision point and that often meant going into the point of sale and particularly packaged goods.
I'm not sure that's massively driven by media and it's more driven by the ferocious retail environment. Having worked at a big CPG company, I can tell you that the trade relationships are much more difficult than the media relationships.
So a lot of that money moves in because of their relationships with the trade rather than because of proper media planning.
Search Results for: Hip Mama
So we, again -- and CPGs tend to have higher television budgets because they need broad reach to reach people, be top of mind, and TV is still the only medium that delivers that. Well, there's no doubt and it's also easier to plan and buy a campaign in mass media. And also mostly controlled by the retailers, that environment. But on that point though, when I was on your website, you know, hopscotching from region to region around the world, an awful lot of your organizations from a regional standpoint were saying that they were touting e-commerce as a growth area for their business and I was just wondering if you could define e-commerce from the GroupM definition standpoint.
Define the amorphous base of e-commerce? I mean, again, we're working with a loss of consumers who have reached the market that don't involve retail. I'm trying to help them pick up consumers and lead them all the way down to the endpoint, and the endpoint of that funnel is e-commerce.
So can we help them build that engine at the back end to help actually move product outside the retail environment? Just a couple more questions. Are you hearing any dialogue -- I'm thinking here about the Canadian market both from a television industry standpoint and from an agency standpoint.
Are you hearing any backchannel conversations about networks and program producers moving more towards North American rights as a model versus Canadian rights? Taking advantage of you being here, this is on a subset.
It's gone to specialty but do you feel that children's advertising needs to be reviewed with the idea of lightening the load regulatorily? With the idea of? With the idea of lightening the regulatory requirements, trying to encourage spend back into mainstream. I think if you have responsible advertisers -- and which we're lucky that we have a number of CPGs that are and are voluntary members of various schemes.
We have very strict rules on the composition of programs that we'll place their advertising in or not. And I think if you have responsible advertisers who sign up voluntarily to that sort of stuff, it's much better than hard regulation. Advertising always adapts to conditions in the market and are you finding that your industry is developing closer relationships with the program producers rather than the aggregators of programming? You know, I'm thinking of the old days of sponsored shows and product placement and so on.
As an organization we do because we are fully behind the creation of great content. So we work with the Canadian broadcasters to help them make content.
So we have production relationships. It's a sort of partnership program. There are lots of places where advertisers are thinking of making their own content now and syndicating that and we can facilitate that, but again, the scale of that is small. Again, at the risk of contradicting myself, this will be my last question. But I mean, I think -- I've heard that lots of times from lots of different people, you know, in different markets around the world.
I think if she could tell the people behind me from all different broadcasters how they could make a hit, they will be doing it. You know, it's television, hits aren't necessarily formulaic and, you know, there's going to be some hits and misses, right? Absolutely and I think that we all as advertisers, we need strong broadcast partners because they deliver our broad audiences and if they are allowed to make the revenue to develop the content, then hits will come like "Rookie Blue," which is now shown on ABC in the U.
That is, I imagine, termed a hit. Those are my questions, sir. Garvie, thank you so much for being here this morning. On who's buying it, what audience. It's difficult to compare CPMs across markets and if it's a cost per thousand, I imagine that, you know, that's a -- it's not a cost per rating. A cost per rating in the States is going to be much bigger than a cost per rating here.
In Canada, is the same eyeball watching an American show worth more than that eyeball watching a Canadian show? Can you speak to us on that issue? I think that the Canadian broadcast industry should be better measured. I think one of the issues they've had with digital coming into Canada is digital is measured and there's data coming from every single source. That would certainly help -- a better measurement system would help curtail the migration of revenues from the traditional TV platform to the digital world.
I think it would give us a much better view of exactly what was happening. So, we have the data. I'm not sure why it's not unified and made public. I'm sure they were looking at it. How much they're using, I don't know. Well, I assume for them, yes. We've also heard a lot about sort of the uptake in our TV ads. I'm not sure it drives revenue. I think it makes advertising more efficient. I'm not sure it drives revenue for content creators. In terms of real-time bidding and broadcasters, wouldn't it drive revenue for them to have access to this kind of model?
It certainly is driving revenue on the digital front and the CPMs of RTB are certainly growing exponentially year over year. I think there's always a place for programmatic buying of media and buying audiences, rather than environment.
But there's always, also, going to be the buying of environment and the buying of -- and television has always been audience buying. We buy audiences on television. We don't buy, necessarily, one or two shows. We buy packages of shows. Effectively, we're doing the same as RTB. To get rid of excess inventory? You'd have to ask these guys behind me how much excess inventory they actually have.
Thank you so much. Those are our questions. They're in the room. I think they've been following it online, as well. I think you may be just as many as the panel from Bell, it looks like. It makes you wonder who's running the company, today.
Northern Wilds November 2018
While it is large, we are here representing French and English broadcasting, distribution in French- and English-language markets, local TV production and, of course, our experts. Wade Oosterman, president of Bell Mobility and residential services and chief brand office. Television viewing costs Canadians just 24 cents per hour and offers a wide array of services with more packaging flexibility than is offered in the United States.
That means regulation should not favour one type of broadcaster or distribution platform over another. And it certainly cannot continue to provide structural advantages to foreign players without, in the long term, dramatically undermining the cultural objectives of the Broadcasting Act. Choix et souplesse pour les consommateurs.
Promotion de notre contenu. La distribution sur toutes les plateformes. To summarize, I'm going to cover each aspect. There is no evidence of dissatisfaction with existing basic packages, but, of course, BDUs should be free to offer skinny basic or any other packages.
That shift leads to a virtuous cycle, driving audience attention and subscriptions; therefore, funding more content. This remains the principal entry point into the system for viewers. Yet, today, it is unsustainable. Every day we try to attract customers to Bell Fibe and Satellite TV and our competitors do the same for their services.
And, of course, pick-and-pay practically eliminates the need for predefined build-your-own-packages, giving ultimate flexibility. In fact, the empirical research shows the same thing. Merci, Wade, et bonjour tout le monde. We have to decide: If we do, our local specialty proposal is a sound way to achieve that goal. These stations are the primary way that citizens engage with each other via their broadcasting system. In the Commission's research, 81 per cent of Canadians cite local news as important to them, more than any other category of programming.
The production of news -- reporters and cameras on the ground in our communities -- still depends crucially on local television stations. We posted all of the full interviews online. On the night of the election, which brought in Edmonton's first new mayor in nine years, CTV journalists ensured that viewers could hear from each elected council member.
Our team was later commended by the mayor and the local RCMP detachment. Our northern Ontario stations operate the longest-running telethon in Canada that will raise nearly half a million dollars this year. In fact, in total, we airedfree community-enriching public service announcements last year alone.
Notwithstanding what you just heard from Wendy, the existing business model for these services is simply unsustainable. See, operating transmitters comprises less than 1 per cent of our local TV operating costs and the savings from shutting down transmitters would be more than offset by lost revenues from ad revenue from those over-the-air viewers and also copyright payments under the distant signal retransmission regime.
In fact just this past weekend, it was simulcast that allowed Canadian networks who were broadcasting the annual Stand Up to Cancer event to ensure that all funds raised from Canadian viewers remained in Canada. The vast majority of interveners, including all major stakeholders, and more than 90 per cent of the individual consumers who addressed this issue, have supported maintaining simultaneous substitution.
We appreciate the concerns for those who receive these signals over the air, but without this support local television could disappear entirely for all Canadians. Yes, that is our motivation: You see, bundling is what allows not just the biggest hits, but also a wide variety of creative and edgy content to be available to Canadians. Digital radio services, like Rdio and Pandora, and digital magazine services, like NextIssue, these all bundle content in order to deliver the best consumer value.
In my opinion this is a tall task that has significant downside risk for every stakeholder. In fact, it's just the opposite. What we're proposing is an unbundled world, where each of our services, from TSN to Bravo to Book TV, they will thrive or fail based on the consumer value that they deliver. All we're asking for is the freedom to work creatively with our distribution partners to find a model that supports the production and discovery of a great variety of quality content for Canadians.
Our regulatory framework has always reflected a bargain that balances privileges against important public service obligations. We understand that many of the privileges will be pared back and we are not resisting these changes, nor are we seeking the elimination of all of our obligations.
Thank you very much. You can direct them to me and I'll pass them along to the most appropriate person. I'm sure will not be surprised to know we have many questions for you, and so I'll try to be efficient in asking.
You went back to the same machine. When the money was gone, you looked over both shoulders and watched me watch you again. You walked over to me and asked if I brought my credit card. Just close the damn door. Sign up Before I left for Indiana the next morning, Grandmama asked if I would go outside on the porch. Everyone else was either watching Tiger Woods beat white men in golf or they were in the kitchen assembling two-pound plates of food and slicing up German chocolate cake and sweet potato pie to take home.
I sat in the same yellow peeling chair I sat in fifteen years earlier. She told me no part of the world stops changing just because you leave it.
I want you to take better care of yourself, Grandmama. You getting enough exercise? The worst kinds of teachers be the teachers that teach other folk how to be like them.
We all got ears. We all know when folk talking down to us. My whole life, I been exercising. I walk up and down this twice a day picking up cans to take to the can man. Them nice Mexican folk off in the trailer park next door, they brang me some of they cans after seeing me walk up and down this road. So I get my exercise. I want you to call your mama and Jimmy Earl more. Call your uncle Jimmy Earl more, too. And some folk, they be so good at giving away blessings.
You give away your blessings enough, one day the Lord will up and take whatever blessing you need and leave you with nan blessing at all. On our way up to Indiana, I did not eat or drink. I had no way of knowing how much I weighed until I paid the dollar to weigh myself on the raggedy bathroom scale at a rest stop in Tennessee.
According to the scale, I was pounds, up two pounds from when I weighed myself at the hospital. A few miles down the road, we stopped at a grocery store that sold hot food. Uncle Jimmy told me to wait in the van. He came out with nothing and headed to another grocery store that served hot food.
This time, he came out with two beige Styrofoam containers filled with greens and corn bread. He was trying to right his wrong. According to Uncle Jimmy, Grandmama said it was time for me to get a real job so I could help the family with money.
I told Uncle Jimmy I made about twelve thousand dollars a year at Indiana. After paying my rent and my bills, I had about two hundred and twenty dollars left every month. A hundred went to the student loans from Millsaps I defaulted on when you left all the notices in the mailbox. Forty went to Grandmama. Twenty went to savings. Sixty went to food. Make some real money. Uncle Jimmy took off without responding to my question. After he dropped me off, I knew he was going to get back to flying and crashing because flying and crashing were what people in our family did when we were alone, ashamed, and scared to death.
I rubbed my palms up and down my abs, searching for new muscles. I ran my fingers over my pecs, flexed both to see which one was more defined.